Temu, Tariffs, and The New Rules of Global Supply Chains
How Temu is adapting to rising tariffs and shifting fulfillment strategies, challenging Amazon and redefining global e-commerce logistics.
Hey, Nikhil here—welcome to The Silk Road Nexus. Twice a week, I unpack what’s shaping the world of supply chain—from deep dives on strategy and optimization to real stories from the frontlines of global commerce.
If this is your first read, you’re right on time to join a growing circle of operators, thinkers, and builders reimagining how the world moves.
Chaos
The next major disruption in global trade may not come from a pandemic, a strike, or a natural disaster, but from a policy announcement. ⚖️
With a single change, tariffs have returned as a powerful force — catching companies off guard, raising prices, and placing business leaders squarely in the middle of political tension. 🔥
This isn’t just another trade disagreement. It’s a slow but deep change in how commerce operates. 🧭
Temu, the scrappy challenger, is navigating the chaos with speed. 🏃♂️
And companies that thought they were insulated? They’re learning the hard way — old strategies may no longer hold up. 🧱
This isn’t a retrospective. It’s a window into the evolving rules of commerce — and what businesses must learn before the next policy shock hits. 🔍
Temu’s original cross-border model — which cut out intermediaries and connected Chinese manufacturers directly to U.S. consumers — didn’t just save costs. 💸
It fundamentally disrupted Amazon’s retail flywheel. 🔄
Jeff Bezos’ strategy, built in the 2000s, hinged on using low prices and a great experience to attract traffic, which in turn gave Amazon bargaining power with sellers to lower prices further. 🎯
But Temu’s aggressive, factory-direct pricing short-circuited that loop, challenging the foundation of Amazon’s scale advantage before tariffs forced a reset. 🚫
🇨🇳 The Tariff Shock
Due to US legal restrictions, Temu cannot build overseas warehouses in the US for local distribution. 📦
According to US laws revised in 2015, individual consumers can import goods tax-free up to $800 per day, but if Temu’s US subsidiary imports and then redistributes, tariffs would be required. 💼
Temu’s signature strategy relied on ultra-cheap, direct-to-consumer shipments from Chinese factories, bypassing the need for warehousing, intermediaries, or traditional supply chains. 🚢
But overnight, that model became economically unsustainable. 💣
Temu’s fulfillment model operates as a streamlined three-stage flow optimized for cost efficiency across borders. 📉
First, goods are consolidated in domestic warehouses in China, where bulk shipments are prepared. 🧱
In the second stage, these consolidated shipments are transported across the Pacific via freight forwarding partners — leveraging cost-optimized sea or air cargo. ✈️
Once they arrive in the U.S., the third and final leg begins: Temu relies on regional logistics hubs and partners like USPS and UPS for last-mile delivery. 📬
This flow reduces reliance on expensive domestic infrastructure by combining bulk shipping with just-in-time fulfillment. ⏱️
Cost-effectiveness is maximized at each step — from origin warehouse selection to U.S. delivery route planning — allowing Temu to offer low prices even with minimal margin flexibility. 💹
The expiration of the de minimis exemption and the imposition of tariffs up to 145% on Chinese imports have fundamentally altered the cost structure of cross-border commerce. 📊
Retailers dependent on low-cost imports from China — like Temu — have been thrust into reactive mode. 🔄
🏁 How Temu Responded
To absorb this policy shock, Temu deployed a two-pronged strategy: 🧠
Shift sourcing and fulfillment to U.S.-based suppliers. 🇺🇸
I estimate a $6-$10 increase in operations cost per order (details below)
Launch a hybrid fulfillment model (Y2) that externalizes risk onto sellers. 📤. [Source: Chinesellers, they received an email about the change in strategy from Temu and plan to move ahead with Y2 Model]
I estimate a $8-$10 increase in costs for sellers, shirking their profit margins (details below)
Each path comes with tradeoffs, but both make it clear that Temu is evolving its logistics architecture to survive in a more regulated trade environment. ⚙️
That said, I don’t believe this shift is driven solely by tariffs. Temu likely anticipated the need to pivot toward a more predictable, cost-efficient fulfillment model even before the policy pressure.
In fact, indications of this shift started last year when Temu launched semi-managed fulfillment, asking suppliers to take a lead role in inventory management, pricing, and related operations — a clear signal that it was preparing to decentralize and streamline logistics. 📦
Consider this: moving two million tons of freight requires 40–50 Boeing 747 flights per day.
[Assuming Temu averages $15 per package and $3.50 per item, a $30 billion annual sales volume equates to roughly 2 billion packages or 2 billion kilograms (2 million tons) of cargo. Given that a Boeing 747 can carry 100,000 kilograms, this freight volume would require approximately 20,000 747-equivalent flights per year, or an estimated 40 to 55 aircraft per day, including a mix of 747s and smaller freighters like the Boeing 767.]
Relying on that volume of air cargo is neither sustainable nor scalable. Shifting to domestic suppliers or better-planned ocean freight reduces that burden — and gives Temu tighter control over demand and costs.
Tariffs simply accelerated what was already a necessary shift: finding a way to compete with Amazon and Walmart on price, without bleeding margin. Temu won’t go head-to-head with these giants in every category, but it will stay aggressive where cost matters most — targeting price-sensitive customers who are willing to trade speed for savings.
📦 Path 1: Embracing Local-Origin Products
Temu’s first move was to preload high-demand inventory into U.S. warehouses and partner with local sellers. 🏪
This allows Temu to:
Avoid exposure to the 145% tariffs by ensuring goods originate domestically ❌📦
Offer faster delivery (2–3 days) 🚚
Gain clearer insight into real-time demand trends, enabling more accurate inventory forecasting and restocking decisions 📈
Strategic Benefits:
Competitive speed advantage vs. rivals like Shein ⏩
Reduces cross-border uncertainty by shifting fulfillment to more stable domestic logistics — though not without introducing new operational tradeoffs 🛠️
Signals alignment with protectionist trade policy, possibly reducing future regulatory scrutiny — but not guaranteed goodwill 🧩
Cost Implications for Temu:
➡️ Estimated net cost increase per order for Temu: $6–$10
Implications for Others:
Temu’s pivot from factory-to-doorstep shipments to U.S.-based inventory marks a fundamental change in its operational DNA. 🧬
While this shift may reduce tariff exposure and improve delivery speed, it sacrifices the core arbitrage advantage that fueled its meteoric rise, “the price”. 💵
Temu now enters a domain where price leadership is harder to defend, operational costs rise, and domestic competitors like Amazon have scale and infrastructure advantages. 🏗️
For U.S. retailers, the challenge is no longer just competing on price — it’s staying agile as Temu experiments with hybrid fulfillment to protect margin and retain its user base. 🔧
Temu’s pivot to U.S. fulfillment disrupts the volume flow to Chinese suppliers. 🔄
Those who relied on Temu’s direct-from-China model must now either establish domestic warehousing partnerships, onboard to Y2 with greater operational responsibility, or risk being sidelined. ⛔
This shift may hurt smaller, low-margin suppliers who lack the capital or logistics know-how to navigate the new model. ❗
While China’s vast supplier base gives Temu redundancy, the strategic relationship becomes transactional — suppliers must adapt quickly to retain shelf space. 🛒
In the long term, Temu’s preference may tilt toward more reliable, logistically mature partners, changing the composition of its supplier network. 🧱
Drawbacks:
Higher warehousing and logistics cost structure 🏢
Slower assortment refresh rate 🔄
Dilution of Temu’s low-price brand identity 💔
🚚 Path 2: Y2 — Just-in-Time Cross-Border Fulfillment
Temu also introduced the Y2 model, where sellers ship directly from China after a U.S. customer places an order. 📦
Sellers now handle:
Export paperwork 📑
U.S. customs duties 🛃
Tariff compliance ⚖️
Last-mile coordination 📫
Think of it as Amazon’s FBM — but built for tariff-era arbitrage. 💡
Why It Exists:
Preserves Temu’s low-cost positioning 🧾
Requires no U.S. warehousing 🚫🏢
Enables sellers to enter the U.S. without infrastructure 🚀
How It De-Risks Temu:
Reduces capital lock-in for inventory 💰
Externalizes tariff risk to sellers 📉
Lowers fixed logistics overhead ⚙️
Seller Tradeoffs:
Must manage complex compliance workflows 🧩
Bear the risk of delayed or rejected customs clearance 🚫
Provide customer support for fulfillment issues 🧑💻
📉 COST INCREASES for Chinese Sellers (Y2 Model)
➡️ Estimated net cost increase per order for sellers: $8–15 (plus tariff risk)
Drawbacks of Y2:
Longer delivery timelines (~9 business days) ⏳
Inconsistent customer experience 🤷♀️
Limited support for high-velocity or seasonal SKUs 🎯
🧩 The Combined Outcome
Temu’s hybrid strategy positions it between two extremes: ⚖️
Speed and stability via local fulfillment 🚛
Price and flexibility via cross-border just-in-time 💵
What It Means for Temu:
Maintains market share without pricing out of its core customer base 📊
Preserves growth while testing long-term localization 🧪
Creates operational complexity that must be carefully managed 🧠
What It Means for Chinese Sellers:
Forces rapid logistics and documentation maturity 📋
Encourages bulk shipments or shifts to U.S. warehousing 🏭
Shrinks margin if sellers miscalculate tariffs 📉
📉 What about Domestic Retailers (Amazon, Walmart, etc.)
While Temu adapts, U.S. giants like Amazon and Walmart face their own challenges: 🏢
Amazon’s private label program offers similar SKUs at comparable prices but with better delivery and returns. 🛍️
Walmart’s scale and store network give it last-mile flexibility Temu can’t match. 🏪
Both players benefit from existing infrastructure — Temu must build or rent. 🏗️
But: Amazon’s consideration of showing tariff impacts on the checkout page was politically reprimanded. 🛑
This shows how sensitive the topic of trade visibility has become in the 2025 U.S. political climate. 🗳️
🔚 Conclusion: A Stress Test for Cross-Border Platforms
Temu’s transformation is a blueprint for how agile platforms survive shocks. 🧭
Dual-mode fulfillment models offer flexibility — but complexity scales fast 🔄
Tariff policy is no longer just a sourcing issue — it’s a full-stack product strategy problem 📦
Winning in modern commerce means integrating logistics, policy, and customer promise into one engine 🔧
📉 Alibaba’s 12% stock dip in April 2025 shows the stakes are real. 📉
But Temu’s fast, if imperfect, moves suggest it has no intention of retreating. 🚀
In my view: This isn’t the death of Temu. It’s a real-time adaptation story playing out at policy speed. 🕒
🕰️ The next twelve months will show whether this pivot is sustainable — or a cautionary tale of overreliance on tariff-era arbitrage.
